First of all, playing the score comparison game gets you nowhere. However, I've heard so much about the "12 cupcakes and one good team" that KU deviously prepared for 2007, I just had a to take a crack at understanding this theory.
The first thing I need to understand is who was the one good team -- Virginia Tech or Missouri? It seems unsolvable, but I'd say even the hardcore skeptic ought to concede that both Tech and Missouri are pretty good teams. For space purposes, let's leave it at that and move on to part two.
If I'm Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, Colorado or even Kansas State, I'm probably getting a little sick of being referred to as a "cupcake." Sure maybe they didn't have great seasons, but when did mid-level BCS teams fall to "cupcake" status.
Okay, let's get to the point. This year we get national title contenders Texas, Texas Tech and Oklahoma from the south. Finally, some competition to expose "just a fluke" Kansas. Of course, the four 2007 opponents above were going to do that as well. The confusing part comes in the following list of results from 2007:
Colorado 27, Oklahoma 24
Colorado 31, Texas Tech 26
Texas Tech 34, Oklahoma 27
Kansas State 41, Texas 21
Texas A&M 30, Texas 28
Oklahoma State 49, Texas Tech 45
I threw the Tech/OU score in to back up the concept that maybe the Colorado win over the Sooners wasn't just a freak occurence. If I was a subscriber to cupcake theory, then do I have to describe Texas, Texas Tech and Oklahoma as "super cupcakes?"
Give it a try, but I won't. Those three teams all believe they will win the south and one will. The reality is there is a parity in our league and our conference opponents from last year have really been unfairly criticized simply for failing to knockout a solid KU squad. In fact, when you look at it, you could easily say that OSU and Colorado had seasons very comparable to the Jayhawks 2006 season. If you live in western Kansas, you might even be able to describe KSU that way.
Go ahead and mention a tougher schedule for KU in 2008, but leave the exaggeration to the TV commentators. The 2007 slate wasn't as weak as they would have you believe and that will prove out this year.